Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:54

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

China's electric cars are cheaper, but is there a deeper cost? - BBC

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Cosmic Mystery Solved: Astronomers Have Discovered the Universe’s “Missing” Matter - SciTechDaily

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Thank you.

Let’s just make it real clear:

The Undervalued Medical Power of Muscle - Medscape

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Is the Trump-Zelenskyy meeting a preview of what the US is going to do to Taiwan?

Just in the last 5 years:

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Why are men so attracted to big breasts?

What’s next?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

UFC champ Jon Jones retires, hit with another criminal charge in Albuquerque - Albuquerque Journal

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Trump speech prompts concerns about politicization of military - NBC News

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

India Is Breaking Apart — Geologists Detect Deep Continental Fracture - The Daily Galaxy

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

What do you think about a sister's love?